Professional review
The platform organises sources, evidence and conflicts. It does not replace professional judgement or turn a rule result into an automatic recommendation.
Genetics interpreted alongside current health context
Consent & provenanceEvery permission and source version recorded
Qualified reviewSafety and context checked before release
Measured, not imaginedNo diagnosis or deterministic prediction
A dietitian reviews every action plan. A medical reviewer, pharmacist, genetic counsellor or second reviewer is added when the case, finding or safety rule requires their scope.
The workspace shows the source, date, questionnaire version, customer edits, laboratory version, evidence item, rule output and clinically relevant changes behind each candidate finding.
Pregnancy, allergies, medicine interactions, major renal or hepatic context, active treatment, abnormal biomarkers or insufficient evidence can block or qualify a finding regardless of the genetic association.
A reviewer can approve within policy, limit, suppress, request more information, refer or hold. The decision stores the reason, role, timestamp, e-signature and source versions.
The final action plan contains no more than three customer priorities unless an authorised override is recorded. Food and lifestyle appear before optional product considerations.
If a reviewer, laboratory or customer corrects material source information, the affected interpretation is reassessed. A new report version is created and the prior version remains in the audit chain.
Ready when you are
It takes a few minutes, does not require payment, and confirms whether the service scope and supervised collection model fit what you need.
Service information is versioned and distinguishes measured findings, supporting evidence, personal context, professional judgement and limitations.
